Professional Tools and Resources for Behavior Analysts
hosted at Science of Behavior – www.scienceofbehavior.com
Reinforcer Assessment Methods and Forms:
- Any student’s intervention is more likely to be effective when a variety of preferred items, activities, or other “favorites” are identified.
- These potential reinforcers may be very useful in the intervention.
- This is especially true when some team members report that a student “won’t work for anything.”
Several reinforcer assessment methods are described below.
Interview Methods and Forms
- The interview method involves you, other informants who know the student well, and the student (with good communication skills) in a discussion that is guided by open-ended questions.
- The interviewer may add probing questions or comparison queries like “what does he like the most?”
Resources:
Reinforcer Assessment for Individuals with Severe Disabilities – Interview form
Various interview forms and related resources posted by Autism Teaching Supports
Surveys or inventories may also be used to rank order preferences from highest to lowest.
Resources from Jim Wright’s interventioncentral.org:
- Jackpot Reinforcer Survey – Supports selection of potential reinforcers of various types:
- Academic or Non-academic Activities * Adult or Peer Attention
- Edible or Tangible Items * Escape
- New items or activities may be added.
- A custom Reinforcer Survey tool or a Reward Menu can be printed before the interview.
- Or, information can be entered online during the interview and printed afterward.
- “Rewards” – Helpful tips
Other resources:
Student Interview and Inventory Forms from Pasco County Public Schools, Florida
Reinforcer Assessment by Direct Observation:
- This method requires more time and effort than interviewing, but more valid information is likely to be obtained.
- Expertise in behavioral observation and measurement methods is required.
- Consultation from a professional with advanced training may be advisable.
- Sample procedure:
- Setting: May be during free time in a natural environment like the classroom or a room at home. In some cases, the natural setting or a different setting is enriched with many of the student’s favorite items or activities.
- Procedure: The individual is briefly exposed to an array or items or activities that are believed to be liked (preferred). The student is then given free access to the items and activities. No demands are placed on the student and there are no restrictions for access.
- Measurement: The observer records the amount of time the person engages with each item and activity. The cumulative observation time may be several hours over multiple days. When the data indicate that the student has accessed an item or activity for more time, it is presumed that the item or activity is of greater preference.
Systematic (Trial-Based) Reinforcer Assessment Methods and Forms:
Systematic assessment typically yields more valid information than any other methods.
- Advanced expertise in stimulus presentation, observation, and measurement is required.
- Consultation and proficiency-based training from a Behavior Analyst may be advisable.
Stimulus preference assessment procedures:
- Video: Stimulus Preference Assessment Procedures – by Iser Deleon (Duration: 1 hour, 24 min)
- Autism Center of Excellence – Western Michigan University
- Multiple Stimulus Without Replacement (MSWO) procedure:
Other resources from Jim Wright of interventioncentral.org:
Reinforcer Delivery Cues and Timing Tools:
Use audio, vibration, and/or visual cues to help improve intervention success by implementing consistent schedules of reinforcement.
There are many uses for cues:
- Signal adults when to look for and reinforce specific desired behaviors.
- Signal the student when the next opportunity for reinforcer delivery will occur.
- Signal students when to ask for feedback about their behaviors (“how am I doing?”).
- Signal students when to self-monitor their behaviors. Some intervention plans are stronger when they include student self-monitoring and self-reinforcement.
Variable schedules of cues can be generated (see below.) These prevent the student from learning to predict fixed schedules.
The schedule of cues can be thinned to occur less often as the student makes progress. For example, an initial 5 minute schedule may be gradually thinned to a 7 minute schedule, then a 10 minute schedule, then a 15 minute schedule, and finally a 30 minute schedule.
If you want to prevent the student from hearing the cues, mute or reduce the volume, use tactile (vibrating) cues, or wear earbuds or headphones.
Mobile devices, smart phones, and smart watches provide a variety of applications (apps) for recording and/or producing voice cues, sounds (e.g., beep, ding), or vibration cues.
Apps are available in the Apple and Android stores. These can be very efficient for timing the delivery of reinforcers. For example, the Motiv-Aider is available at Android and Apple app stores ($2-3), and as a small portable device ($50).
When you find a good app, please share the news so it can be posted here for others!
Various websites have timers and clocks that can generate cues. Check these options: online countdown timer and alarm (same timer – full screen version) or one of several devices.
Variable interval (VI) schedules can significantly improve the effectiveness of a reinforcement intervention. Students are less able to predict when the next reinforcement opportunity is coming.
- Example: A VI-10 schedule may beep at 7, 11, 14, 8, 10 minutes and so on.
-
- Click here for an audio CD with 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 15 minute variable schedules.
- Or, make one yourself – click here to generate the VI schedule and record cues to a mobile device, smart phone, smart watch, or MP3 player.
- Or, prepare a random written schedule for manually setting a timer or alarm.
- Click here to see a sample schedule.